Flagship instrument

Decision Desk

One case file per governance action. It carries the ledger record, your research, your conflict check, your due diligence, the questions you put to experts, the peer review of your reasoning, your rationale, and the summary you publish so anyone can audit how you decided.

This summary is the work of one representative. The Institute does not endorse, coordinate or aggregate positions, and publishes no consensus figure of any kind.

The workflow

01
Governance action
Identify the action from chain: ID, type, deadline and the proposal source.
02
Research
Read the proposal and gather evidence. Save what you relied on.
03
Conflict check
Run your register against this action and record what you found.
04
Due diligence
Constitutional requirements, budget and claims, risks and unknowns.
05
Expert input
Write the questions you need answered, and record any answers.
06
Peer review
Have another member test your reasoning, not your position.
07
Rationale
Draft the CIP-136 rationale you will anchor with your vote.
08
Decision summary
Publish the standard summary so anyone can audit how you decided.

Start from a live action

All open actions

Reading the ledger

Your cases

Case files are private to you until you publish a decision summary.