Conflict Handling & Recusal Decision Tree workspace

0/12 fields

autosaves in this browser

This structures the question and leaves the judgement with you. It is not legal advice and it does not decide the outcome.

The action and the parties

0/3 done

Action title

Use the title as the proposer wrote it, so this record can be matched later.

Action identifierOptional

The on-chain identifier, if the action is already submitted. Leave blank if not.

Submitter

Who put this forward, in the form the record shows.

Named partners, subcontractors and recipients

0 words

Parties whose competitive position would changeOptional

0 words

Anyone among the above you know personallyOptional

0 words

Interest categories

Answer every category, including where the answer is none. The record matters.

0/1 done

Interests found

One row per item. Rows can be reordered, duplicated and removed.

No rows yet. Add the first one below; you can reorder and duplicate rows as you go.

Categories checked with nothing foundOptional

0 words

Materiality tests

0/4 done

Would a reasonable observer aware of these facts question your independence

Does any interest point toward a particular outcome, and which

0 words

Would discovery after the fact damage trust more than disclosure now

Do several individually small interests combine into a material one

Outcome and record

Choose the outcome yourself. Nothing here computes it for you or bears on how you vote.

0/4 done

Your position

Reasoning, in one paragraph

0 words

What you actually did

0 words

Where the disclosure was publishedOptional

Date publishedOptional

ParticipationOptional

Review date for this assessment

Working notesOptional

Anything the structured fields do not cover.

0 words

The DRep Standards Institute provides decision-support tools. It does not determine how any DRep votes. This record was produced independently by its author.

0% - autosaves in this browser