0/14 fields
autosaves in this browser
Yes, No and Abstain are recorded identically here. Nothing in this template prefers an outcome.
The governance action
Identify the action so this record stands on its own later.
Use the title as the proposer wrote it, so this record can be matched later.
The on-chain identifier, if the action is already submitted. Leave blank if not.
A link to the primary source, not to a summary or a thread about it.
Decision
All three are full decisions and require the same depth of reasoning.
0 words
0 words
Basis for the decision
Only what you checked at the primary source yourself.
0 words
What you took on someone's word. Being explicit here is not a weakness in the record.
0 words
One row per item. Rows can be reordered, duplicated and removed.
No rows yet. Add the first one below; you can reorder and duplicate rows as you go.
0 words
0 words
0 words
0 words
Conflicts
0 words
Optional standardised public summary
A standard format for communicating a decision. It standardises the format only, never the decision.
0 words
0 words
0 words
0 words
0 words
Correction log
Add dated entries. Never edit the original record text.
One row per item. Rows can be reordered, duplicated and removed.
No rows yet. Add the first one below; you can reorder and duplicate rows as you go.
Anything the structured fields do not cover.
0 words
If a step here felt uncertain
Writing a Vote Rationale People Can Audit teaches the method behind this tool. Reading it does not change anything you have written here.
Open lessonThe DRep Standards Institute provides decision-support tools. It does not determine how any DRep votes. This record was produced independently by its author.
0% - autosaves in this browser
