Tom Becker
Non-profit governance background. Coordinates the Institute's peer review circles.
Demo profile - this is a fictional example used to illustrate the member profile format.
Governance philosophy
“Good process will sometimes produce decisions I dislike, and I would still defend the process.”
What could change my mind?
Evidence that the process I am defending systematically excludes people it should include.
Material conflict disclosures
Disclosure currentLast updated 7/9/2026
- Unpaid board member of a non-profit that has not sought treasury funding.
Standards commitments
- Publish a written rationale for every vote
- Declare and recuse where a conflict exists
- Participate in a peer review circle each term
Recent published vote rationales
Vote direction is recorded as factual profile history. It is not assessed, scored, or ranked by the Institute.
- Voted YesGA-2026-036 · 5/30/2026
Info action - Code of conduct for governance forums
“Enforcement detail is thin, but the action commits to a review cycle, which is where the detail can land.”
Full rationale - link placeholder
Public resources authored
- Expert Review Request Template
Events and workshops contributed to
- Peer review circle steward, 2026 cohort
- Workshop: Recusal in practice (March 2026)
Browse other members
Profiles are listed alphabetically. The Institute never ranks members or orders them by delegation size.