Tom Becker
Non-profit governance background. Coordinates the Institute's peer review circles.
Demo profile - this is a fictional example used to illustrate the member profile format.
Governance philosophy
“Good process will sometimes produce decisions I dislike, and I would still defend the process.”
What could change my mind?
Evidence that the process I am defending systematically excludes people it should include.
Material conflict disclosures
Disclosure currentLast updated 7/9/2026
- Unpaid board member of a non-profit that has not sought treasury funding.
View conflict registerView public recordDeclared interests with dates and materiality, published by the member.
Evidence of standards
Published records only. The Institute does not score, rank or rate any of it.
Decision Summaries
0
Published votes
0
Published instruments
0
Published Decision Summaries
Reading…
Standards commitments
- Publish a written rationale for every vote
- Declare and recuse where a conflict exists
- Participate in a peer review circle each term
Recent published vote rationales
Vote direction is recorded as factual profile history. It is not assessed, scored, or ranked by the Institute.
- Voted YesGA-2026-036 · 5/30/2026
Info action - Code of conduct for governance forums
“Enforcement detail is thin, but the action commits to a review cycle, which is where the detail can land.”
Full rationale - link placeholder
Public resources authored
- Expert Review Request Template
Events and workshops contributed to
- Peer review circle steward, 2026 cohort
- Workshop: Recusal in practice (March 2026)
Browse other members
Profiles are listed alphabetically. The Institute never ranks members or orders them by delegation size.